Australia has taken an unprecedented step to protect children online by approving a law banning social media use for anyone under the age of 16.

While this legislative move has been met with both praise and criticism, it marks a turning point in global conversations about digital safety and the role of government in regulating the internet.

Australia Sets a Bold Precedent with Social Media Ban

On paper, the law sounds ambitious: a minimum age restriction higher than any other country, stringent penalties for non-compliance, and no parental consent loopholes. But as the world watches, the success—or failure—of this law could set the tone for similar measures globally.

Aiming to Shield Childhood

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has championed the legislation as a means of protecting children from the myriad dangers of social media. “We want our kids to have a childhood,” he declared, emphasizing that the government’s role is to support parents navigating an increasingly digital world.

The motivation is clear: countless studies have linked social media to risks like cyberbullying, mental health issues, and addictive behaviors among young users. Parent advocacy groups, like the one led by Amy Friedlander, have hailed the law as a way to reduce this “impossible choice” parents face between allowing social media use and risking their children feeling isolated.

Australia Just Banned Social Media For Kids Under 16

Video by The Project

Implementation Challenges

Despite its noble intentions, the legislation leaves many questions unanswered. For starters, the law does not specify how platforms like TikTok, Instagram, and Facebook will enforce these restrictions. Michelle Rowland, Australia’s communications minister, has stated that the government will rely on age-verification technology.

However, experts have raised valid concerns about the feasibility and privacy implications of such measures. Biometrics, identity verification, and other methods being considered could inadvertently expose sensitive user data to misuse. Critics have also pointed out how easily tech-savvy teens could bypass the restrictions using VPNs or shared accounts.

Industry Pushback

Tech giants like Meta, TikTok, and Google have expressed skepticism about the law’s effectiveness. While some have criticized the lack of clarity in the legislation, others argue that it oversimplifies the complex issue of online safety.

TikTok, in particular, has questioned the broad and vague definition of “social media platform” used in the bill. X (formerly Twitter) has gone a step further, questioning the bill’s compatibility with international human rights regulations.

The Impact on Youth

Youth advocates have voiced concerns that the law sidelines the very group it aims to protect. Members of the eSafety Youth Council have highlighted the importance of including young voices in shaping digital policies. “We understand the risks, but we also know the benefits of social media,” they argue, emphasizing the platform’s role in connection, education, and self-expression.

Without access to mainstream social media, critics warn that teens could migrate to less regulated corners of the internet, potentially exposing them to even greater risks.

A Global Domino Effect?

Australia’s groundbreaking law has sparked interest worldwide. Norway has already pledged to explore similar legislation, and the UK has hinted at considering comparable measures. However, previous attempts elsewhere show that such bans are easier said than done.

France, for example, implemented a law requiring parental consent for social media use by those under 15. Research later found that nearly half of underage users bypassed the restriction using VPNs. In the US, a similar law in Utah was struck down by a federal judge on constitutional grounds.

A Complex Balancing Act

Prime Minister Albanese acknowledges the challenges but remains steadfast in his support of the law. He compares it to alcohol bans for minors; while not foolproof, such restrictions establish societal norms. “We know it’s the right thing to do,” he insists.

As governments around the world grapple with the implications of regulating social media, Australia’s bold experiment will be closely monitored. If successful, it could redefine how societies balance freedom, safety, and privacy in the digital age.

Whether this move will genuinely protect children or simply push the problem elsewhere remains to be seen. One thing is certain; the debate about social media, its role, and its regulation is far from over.